Public outrage meter

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Public outrage meter

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway. How’s this?

Sector

N/A

Geography

N/A

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Public outrage meter

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway. How’s this?

Setor

N/A

Geografia

N/A

Medidor de indignação pública

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Último Post

Gerenciamento de ESG

Sustentabilidade = oportunidade de contar histórias

Materialidade dinâmica

Fluxo de trabalho de ESG

May 28, 2023

Public outrage meter

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway. How’s this?

Setor

N/A

Geografia

N/A

Game of Thrones da Arábia

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Último Post

Tempos tensos no Irã

Projeto Mina Profunda

Seaspiracy (Mar Vermelho) - Pescando pela verdade

Mapa de influência dos oligarcas de Putin

May 28, 2023

Public outrage meter

Setor

N/A

Geografia

N/A

Como uma Empresa Global de Iluminação Aumentou a Geração de Leads

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Último Post

June 5, 2024

Navegando no campo de batalha da energia eólica na União Europeia

Coordenação de uma estratégia global de impostos sobre o açúcar

Aprendendo com o escândalo da VW (Volkswagen)

Entrada no mercado de fronteira - Evitando medidas de detenção

May 28, 2023

Public outrage meter

Sector

N/A

Geografía

N/A

Cómo una Empresa Global de Iluminación Aumentó la Generación de Leads

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Última Publicación

June 5, 2024

Navegando en el campo de batalla de la energía eólica en la Unión Europea

Aprendiendo del escándalo de VW (Volkswagen)

Coordinación de una estrategia fiscal mundial para el azúcar

Entrada en mercados fronterizos. Evitando la cárcel

May 28, 2023

Public outrage meter

Sector

N/A

Geografía

N/A

Medidor de indignación pública

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Última Publicación

Gestión de ESG

Sostenibilidad = Oportunidad de story-telling

Materialidad dinámica

Flujo de trabajo de ESG

May 28, 2023

Public outrage meter

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway. How’s this?

Sector

N/A

Geografía

N/A

Game of Thrones de Árabia

Is there a simple way of calculating the depth of public outrage against the many corporations in crisis mode? We doubt so, let’s it give a try anyway.

How’s this?

Public Outrage = (P+V)S x T ⁄ (R x I)

Where:

P = Probability of occurrence (0% – 100%). The higher the probability—with no corresponding action in redress by XYZ Corp.—the greater the outrage.
V = Vulnerability of XYZ Corp. to the impact (0 = None; 1 = Minimal; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant). The more invulnerable XYZ Corp. believes it to be, the greater the outrage.
S = Sentiment or likely-public-perception of the experience on a scale -3 (don’t care) to +3 (incensed). -3 where the company practice is simply too complex for the general public—think tax headquarters in Dublin—to +3—where it touches a child’s safety or exposes the confidential data of a (defenseless) public.
T = The time frame in which XYZ Corp. knows of the practices without taking remedial action.
R = Reputation of the firm -3 (reviled) to 0 (neutral) to +3 (love and adulation).
I = Influence XYZ Corp has to get 3rd party opinion leader support and protection (0 = low; 3 = high). And, of course, how fast that support can evaporate (like the battery cells in an iPhone).

It is a first pass at a complex subject, any better attempt is welcome!

‍

Última Publicación

Tiempos tensos en Irán

Proyecto Mina Profunda

Seaspiracy (Mar Rojo) - Pescando la verdad

Mapa de influencia del oligarca de Putin